!1 package init

From: @yaokai13
Reviewed-by: @yanzh_h
Signed-off-by: @yanzh_h

erlang-meck-0001-Workaround-for-Rebar-2.x.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+From: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com>
+Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 16:57:00 +0300
+Subject: [PATCH] Workaround for Rebar 2.x
+
+Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com>
+
+diff --git a/test/meck_tests.erl b/test/meck_tests.erl
+index 270186c..401c466 100644
+--- a/test/meck_tests.erl
++++ b/test/meck_tests.erl
+@@ -1078,13 +1078,7 @@ cover_options_fail_({_OldPath, Src, Module}) ->
+ test_file(Module, Ext) ->
+     filename:join(test_dir(), atom_to_list(Module) ++ Ext).
+ 
+-test_dir() ->
+-    case code:which(?MODULE) of
+-        Filename when is_list(Filename) ->
+-            filename:dirname(Filename);
+-        Atom when is_atom(Atom) ->
+-            error({test_dir_not_found, ?MODULE, Atom})
+-    end.
++test_dir() -> "../" ++ filename:dirname(?FILE).
+ 
+ test_include() -> filename:join(test_dir(), "include").
+ 
+@@ -1098,14 +1092,14 @@ run_mock_no_cover_file(Module) ->
+ %% @doc Verify that passthrough calls _don't_ appear in cover
+ %% analysis.
+ no_cover_passthrough_test() ->
+-    {ok, _} = cover:compile("test/meck_test_module.erl"),
++    {ok, _} = cover:compile(test_file(meck_test_module, ".erl")),
+     {ok, {meck_test_module, {0,3}}} = cover:analyze(meck_test_module, module),
+     passthrough_test([no_passthrough_cover]),
+     {ok, {meck_test_module, {0,3}}} = cover:analyze(meck_test_module, module).
+ 
+ %% @doc Verify that passthrough calls appear in cover analysis.
+ cover_passthrough_test() ->
+-    {ok, _} = cover:compile("test/meck_test_module.erl"),
++    {ok, _} = cover:compile(test_file(meck_test_module, ".erl")),
+     ?assertEqual({ok, {meck_test_module, {0,3}}},
+                  cover:analyze(meck_test_module, module)),
+     passthrough_test([]),
+@@ -1113,7 +1107,7 @@ cover_passthrough_test() ->
+                  cover:analyze(meck_test_module, module)).
+ 
+ cover_path_test() ->
+-    {ok, _} = cover:compile("test/meck_test_module.erl"),
++    {ok, _} = cover:compile(test_file(meck_test_module, ".erl")),
+     ?assertEqual({ok, {meck_test_module, {0,3}}},
+                  cover:analyze(meck_test_module, module)),
+     ok = meck:new(meck_test_module, [passthrough]),

erlang-meck.spec

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+%global realname meck
+%global upstream eproxus
+Name:		erlang-meck
+Version:	0.8.13
+Release:	1
+BuildArch:	noarch
+Summary:	A mocking library for Erlang
+License:	ASL 2.0
+URL:		https://github.com/eproxus/meck
+Source0:	https://github.com/eproxus/meck/archive/%{version}/meck-%{version}.tar.gz
+Patch1:		erlang-meck-0001-Workaround-for-Rebar-2.x.patch
+BuildRequires:	erlang-hamcrest
+BuildRequires:	erlang-rebar
+%description
+With meck you can easily mock modules in Erlang. Since meck is intended to be
+used in testing, you can also perform some basic validations on the mocked
+modules, such as making sure no function is called in a way it should not.
+
+%prep
+%autosetup -p1 -n meck-%{version}
+
+%build
+%{erlang_compile}
+
+%install
+%{erlang_install}
+
+%check
+%{erlang_test -C test.config}
+
+%files
+%license LICENSE
+%doc README.md NOTICE
+%{erlang_appdir}/
+
+%changelog
+* Sat Aug 29 2020 yaokai <yaokai13@huawei.com> - 0.8.13-1
+- package init

erlang-meck.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+version_control: github
+src_repo: eproxus/meck
+tag_prefix: "^"
+seperator: "."