gcc/0135-tree-optimization-PR102622-wrong-code-due-to-signed-.patch
Mingchuan Wu e3967b0b94 [Sync] Sync patch from openeuler/gcc
(cherry picked from commit 63828598f16b978ef91ea80730b8c13a698bfbb0)
2023-12-05 19:18:37 +08:00

95 lines
3.2 KiB
Diff

From 9c3b4e0b5690df62ca5e0c65a73bbccad017be24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 01:28:59 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 20/26] tree-optimization: [PR102622]: wrong code due to signed
one bit integer and "a?-1:0"
So it turns out this is kinda of a latent bug but not really latent.
In GCC 9 and 10, phi-opt would transform a?-1:0 (even for signed 1-bit integer)
to -(type)a but the type is an one bit integer which means the negation is
undefined. GCC 11 fixed the problem by checking for a?pow2cst:0 transformation
before a?-1:0 transformation.
When I added the transformations to match.pd, I had swapped the order not paying
attention and I didn't expect anything of it. Because there was no testcase failing
due to this.
Anyways this fixes the problem on the trunk by swapping the order in match.pd and
adding a comment of why the order is this way.
I will try to come up with a patch for GCC 9 and 10 series later on which fixes
the problem there too.
Note I didn't include the original testcase which requires the vectorizer and AVX-512f
as I can't figure out the right dg options to restrict it to avx-512f but I did come up
with a testcase which shows the problem and even more shows the problem with the 9/10
series as mentioned.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
PR tree-optimization/102622
gcc/ChangeLog:
* match.pd: Swap the order of a?pow2cst:0 and a?-1:0 transformations.
Swap the order of a?0:pow2cst and a?0:-1 transformations.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-10.c: New test.
Reference commit in GCC: 882d806c1a8f9d2d2ade1133de88d63e5d4fe40c
Signed-off-by: Pronin Alexander 00812787 <pronin.alexander@huawei.com>
---
gcc/match.pd | 3 ++-
.../gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-10.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-10.c
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index 9d9627fe7..d7d0dd0f7 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -3412,7 +3412,8 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
(if (integer_onep (@2))
(convert (bit_xor (convert:boolean_type_node @0) { booltrue; } )))
/* a ? powerof2cst : 0 -> (!a) << (log2(powerof2cst)) */
- (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && integer_pow2p (@2))
+ (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && integer_pow2p (@2)
+ && TYPE_PRECISION (type) != 1)
(with {
tree shift = build_int_cst (integer_type_node, tree_log2 (@2));
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-10.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-10.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bdbf5733c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-10.c
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/102622 */
+/* Wrong code introduced due to phi-opt
+ introducing undefined signed interger overflow
+ with one bit signed integer negation. */
+
+struct f{signed t:1;};
+int g(struct f *a, int t) __attribute__((noipa));
+int g(struct f *a, int t)
+{
+ if (t)
+ a->t = -1;
+ else
+ a->t = 0;
+ int t1 = a->t;
+ if (t1) return 1;
+ return t1;
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ struct f a;
+ if (!g(&a, 1)) __builtin_abort();
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.27.0