fix CVE-2023-0465 CVE-2023-2650 CVE-2024-0727
This commit is contained in:
parent
60eb19a199
commit
b08eeb318f
56
backport-CVE-2023-0465.patch
Normal file
56
backport-CVE-2023-0465.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
From b013765abfa80036dc779dd0e50602c57bb3bf95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
||||
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in
|
||||
leaf
|
||||
certs
|
||||
|
||||
Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we
|
||||
later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf
|
||||
cert was bad.
|
||||
|
||||
Fixes: CVE-2023-0465
|
||||
|
||||
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
|
||||
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
|
||||
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20588)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference:https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=b013765abfa80036dc779dd0e50602c57bb3bf95
|
||||
Conflict: Context conflict
|
||||
---
|
||||
Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 11 +++++++++--
|
||||
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
|
||||
index 96f306b..a6878fe 100644
|
||||
--- a/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
|
||||
+++ b/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
|
||||
@@ -1768,16 +1768,23 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx)
|
||||
* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
X509 *x;
|
||||
- int i;
|
||||
- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
|
||||
+ int i, cbcalled = 0;
|
||||
+ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
|
||||
x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i);
|
||||
if (!(x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
+ cbcalled = 1;
|
||||
ctx->current_cert = x;
|
||||
ctx->error = X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION;
|
||||
if (!ctx->verify_cb(0, ctx))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
+ if (!cbcalled) {
|
||||
+ /* Should not be able to get here */
|
||||
+ X509err(X509_F_CHECK_POLICY, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR);
|
||||
+ return 0;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ret == -2) {
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.33.0
|
||||
|
||||
67
backport-CVE-2023-2650.patch
Normal file
67
backport-CVE-2023-2650.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
||||
From 423a2bc737a908ad0c77bda470b2b59dc879936b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
||||
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 10:00:13 +0200
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] Restrict the size of OBJECT IDENTIFIERs that OBJ_obj2txt will
|
||||
translate
|
||||
|
||||
Reference:https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=423a2bc737a908ad0c77bda470b2b59dc879936b
|
||||
Conflict:NA
|
||||
|
||||
OBJ_obj2txt() would translate any size OBJECT IDENTIFIER to canonical
|
||||
numeric text form. For gigantic sub-identifiers, this would take a very
|
||||
long time, the time complexity being O(n^2) where n is the size of that
|
||||
sub-identifier.
|
||||
|
||||
To mitigate this, a restriction on the size that OBJ_obj2txt() will
|
||||
translate to canonical numeric text form is added, based on RFC 2578
|
||||
(STD 58), which says this:
|
||||
|
||||
> 3.5. OBJECT IDENTIFIER values
|
||||
>
|
||||
> An OBJECT IDENTIFIER value is an ordered list of non-negative numbers.
|
||||
> For the SMIv2, each number in the list is referred to as a sub-identifier,
|
||||
> there are at most 128 sub-identifiers in a value, and each sub-identifier
|
||||
> has a maximum value of 2^32-1 (4294967295 decimal).
|
||||
|
||||
Fixes otc/security#96
|
||||
Fixes CVE-2023-2650
|
||||
|
||||
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
||||
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
|
||||
---
|
||||
crypto/objects/obj_dat.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
1 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/crypto/objects/obj_dat.c b/crypto/objects/obj_dat.c
|
||||
index 01cde00e98..c0e55197a0 100644
|
||||
--- a/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/objects/obj_dat.c
|
||||
+++ b/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/objects/obj_dat.c
|
||||
@@ -443,6 +443,25 @@ int OBJ_obj2txt(char *buf, int buf_len, const ASN1_OBJECT *a, int no_name)
|
||||
first = 1;
|
||||
bl = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
+ /*
|
||||
+ * RFC 2578 (STD 58) says this about OBJECT IDENTIFIERs:
|
||||
+ *
|
||||
+ * > 3.5. OBJECT IDENTIFIER values
|
||||
+ * >
|
||||
+ * > An OBJECT IDENTIFIER value is an ordered list of non-negative
|
||||
+ * > numbers. For the SMIv2, each number in the list is referred to as a
|
||||
+ * > sub-identifier, there are at most 128 sub-identifiers in a value,
|
||||
+ * > and each sub-identifier has a maximum value of 2^32-1 (4294967295
|
||||
+ * > decimal).
|
||||
+ *
|
||||
+ * So a legitimate OID according to this RFC is at most (32 * 128 / 7),
|
||||
+ * i.e. 586 bytes long.
|
||||
+ *
|
||||
+ * Ref: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2578#section-3.5
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+ if (len > 586)
|
||||
+ goto err;
|
||||
+
|
||||
while (len > 0) {
|
||||
l = 0;
|
||||
use_bn = 0;
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.34.1
|
||||
|
||||
111
backport-CVE-2024-0727.patch
Normal file
111
backport-CVE-2024-0727.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
|
||||
From f77095c2543ffc1eda06556092de7badac343883 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: j30031148 <jinlun@huawei.com>
|
||||
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 14:47:30 +0800
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] CVE-2024-0727
|
||||
|
||||
Reference:https://gitee.com/openeuler/openssl/commit/09015a582baa980dc04f635504b16fe95dc3790b
|
||||
Conflict:NA
|
||||
---
|
||||
Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_add.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
|
||||
Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_mutl.c | 5 +++++
|
||||
Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_npas.c | 5 +++--
|
||||
Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs7/pk7_mime.c | 8 ++++++--
|
||||
4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_add.c b/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_add.c
|
||||
index d9f03a3..42a73e0 100644
|
||||
--- a/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_add.c
|
||||
+++ b/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_add.c
|
||||
@@ -171,6 +171,12 @@ STACK_OF(PKCS12_SAFEBAG) *PKCS12_unpack_p7data(PKCS7 *p7)
|
||||
PKCS12_R_CONTENT_TYPE_NOT_DATA);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ if (p7->d.data == NULL) {
|
||||
+ PKCS12err(PKCS12_F_PKCS12_UNPACK_P7DATA, PKCS12_R_DECODE_ERROR);
|
||||
+ return NULL;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+
|
||||
return ASN1_item_unpack(p7->d.data, ASN1_ITEM_rptr(PKCS12_SAFEBAGS));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -226,6 +232,11 @@ STACK_OF(PKCS12_SAFEBAG) *PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(PKCS7 *p7, const char *pass,
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!PKCS7_type_is_encrypted(p7))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ if (p7->d.encrypted == NULL) {
|
||||
+ return NULL;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+
|
||||
return PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i(p7->d.encrypted->enc_data->algorithm,
|
||||
ASN1_ITEM_rptr(PKCS12_SAFEBAGS),
|
||||
pass, passlen,
|
||||
@@ -253,6 +264,11 @@ STACK_OF(PKCS7) *PKCS12_unpack_authsafes(PKCS12 *p12)
|
||||
PKCS12_R_CONTENT_TYPE_NOT_DATA);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
+ if (p12->authsafes->d.data == NULL) {
|
||||
+ PKCS12err(PKCS12_F_PKCS12_UNPACK_AUTHSAFES, PKCS12_R_DECODE_ERROR);
|
||||
+ return NULL;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+
|
||||
return ASN1_item_unpack(p12->authsafes->d.data,
|
||||
ASN1_ITEM_rptr(PKCS12_AUTHSAFES));
|
||||
}
|
||||
diff --git a/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_mutl.c b/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_mutl.c
|
||||
index cbf34da..bda3c28 100644
|
||||
--- a/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_mutl.c
|
||||
+++ b/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_mutl.c
|
||||
@@ -80,6 +80,11 @@ int PKCS12_gen_mac(PKCS12 *p12, const char *pass, int passlen,
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+ if (p12->authsafes->d.data == NULL) {
|
||||
+ PKCS12err(PKCS12_F_PKCS12_GEN_MAC, PKCS12_R_DECODE_ERROR);
|
||||
+ return 0;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+
|
||||
salt = p12->mac->salt->data;
|
||||
saltlen = p12->mac->salt->length;
|
||||
if (!p12->mac->iter)
|
||||
diff --git a/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_npas.c b/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_npas.c
|
||||
index 9e8ebb2..19a855b 100644
|
||||
--- a/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_npas.c
|
||||
+++ b/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs12/p12_npas.c
|
||||
@@ -126,8 +126,9 @@ static int newpass_p12(PKCS12 *p12, const char *oldpass, const char *newpass)
|
||||
bags = PKCS12_unpack_p7data(p7);
|
||||
} else if (bagnid == NID_pkcs7_encrypted) {
|
||||
bags = PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(p7, oldpass, -1);
|
||||
- if (!alg_get(p7->d.encrypted->enc_data->algorithm,
|
||||
- &pbe_nid, &pbe_iter, &pbe_saltlen))
|
||||
+ if (p7->d.encrypted == NULL
|
||||
+ || !alg_get(p7->d.encrypted->enc_data->algorithm,
|
||||
+ &pbe_nid, &pbe_iter, &pbe_saltlen))
|
||||
goto err;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
diff --git a/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs7/pk7_mime.c b/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs7/pk7_mime.c
|
||||
index 62fb299..e895deb 100644
|
||||
--- a/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs7/pk7_mime.c
|
||||
+++ b/Cryptlib/OpenSSL/crypto/pkcs7/pk7_mime.c
|
||||
@@ -78,10 +78,14 @@ int SMIME_write_PKCS7(BIO *bio, PKCS7 *p7, BIO *data, int flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
STACK_OF(X509_ALGOR) *mdalgs;
|
||||
int ctype_nid = OBJ_obj2nid(p7->type);
|
||||
- if (ctype_nid == NID_pkcs7_signed)
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ if (ctype_nid == NID_pkcs7_signed) {
|
||||
+ if (p7->d.sign == NULL)
|
||||
+ return 0;
|
||||
mdalgs = p7->d.sign->md_algs;
|
||||
- else
|
||||
+ } else {
|
||||
mdalgs = NULL;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
|
||||
flags ^= SMIME_OLDMIME;
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.27.0
|
||||
|
||||
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Name: shim
|
||||
Version: 15.6
|
||||
Release: 18
|
||||
Release: 19
|
||||
Summary: First-stage UEFI bootloader
|
||||
ExclusiveArch: x86_64 aarch64
|
||||
License: BSD
|
||||
@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ Patch45:backport-CVE-2023-40548-Fix-integer-overflow-on-SBAT-section-.patch
|
||||
Patch46:backport-CVE-2023-40547-avoid-incorrectly-trusting-HTTP-heade.patch
|
||||
Patch47:backport-Further-mitigations-against-CVE-2023-40546-as-a-clas.patch
|
||||
Patch48:backport-CVE-2023-40549-Authenticode-verify-that-the-signatur.patch
|
||||
Patch49: backport-CVE-2023-2650.patch
|
||||
Patch50: backport-CVE-2023-0465.patch
|
||||
Patch51: backport-CVE-2024-0727.patch
|
||||
|
||||
# Feature for shim SMx support
|
||||
Patch9000:Feature-shim-openssl-add-ec-support.patch
|
||||
@ -217,6 +220,9 @@ make test
|
||||
/usr/src/debug/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}/*
|
||||
|
||||
%changelog
|
||||
* Wed Feb 28 2024 zhengxiaoxiao <zhengxiaoxiao2@huawei.com> - 15.6-19
|
||||
- fix CVE-2023-0465 CVE-2023-2650 CVE-2024-0727
|
||||
|
||||
* Tue Jan 30 2024 zhengxiaoxiao <zhengxiaoxiao2@huawei.com> - 15.6-18
|
||||
- fix CVE-2023-40547 CVE-2023-40548 CVE-2023-40549 CVE-2023-40550 CVE-2023-40551
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user