From ef400c3878ad23aa02bd5bb47f089bdef49e9d8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yu Watanabe <watanabe.yu+github@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 20:40:58 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] udev: only ignore ENOENT or friends which suggest the block
 device is not exist
 
The ENOENT, ENXIO, and ENODEV error can happen easily when a block
device appears and soon removed. So, it is reasonable to ignore the
error. But other errors should not occur here, and hence let's handle
them as critical.
 
Reference:https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/ef400c3878ad23aa02bd5bb47f089bdef49e9d8c
Conflict:NA
 
---
 src/udev/udevd.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 
diff --git a/src/udev/udevd.c b/src/udev/udevd.c
index 8389c39f652f..f1f864a4610c 100644
--- a/src/udev/udevd.c
+++ b/src/udev/udevd.c
@@ -399,8 +399,10 @@ static int worker_lock_block_device(sd_device *dev, int *ret_fd) {
 
         fd = open(val, O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_NOFOLLOW|O_NONBLOCK);
         if (fd < 0) {
-                log_device_debug_errno(dev, errno, "Failed to open '%s', ignoring: %m", val);
-                return 0;
+                bool ignore = ERRNO_IS_DEVICE_ABSENT(errno);
+
+                log_device_debug_errno(dev, errno, "Failed to open '%s'%s: %m", val, ignore ? ", ignoring" : "");
+                return ignore ? 0 : -errno;
         }
 
         if (flock(fd, LOCK_SH|LOCK_NB) < 0)
 